Comments on: The Testing Anti-Patterns Drafts: Overusing Mocks http://nutrun.com/weblog/the-testing-anti-patterns-drafts-overusing-mocks/ nutrun Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:52:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Pat Maddox http://nutrun.com/weblog/the-testing-anti-patterns-drafts-overusing-mocks/comment-page-1/#comment-235 Pat Maddox Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:40:47 +0000 http://new-site.nutrun.com/?p=64#comment-235 I think the real problem here is not the design, but rather that the test code is poorly written. You can read my full response at my (brand new! :) blog: http://evang.eli.st/blog/2006/11/29/one-test-class-per-production-class-the-real-testing-anti-pattern I think the real problem here is not the design, but rather that the test code is poorly written. You can read my full response at my (brand new! :) blog: http://evang.eli.st/blog/2006/11/29/one-test-class-per-production-class-the-real-testing-anti-pattern

]]> By: Jay http://nutrun.com/weblog/the-testing-anti-patterns-drafts-overusing-mocks/comment-page-1/#comment-234 Jay Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:47:51 +0000 http://new-site.nutrun.com/?p=64#comment-234 I like the article. I strongly dislike the line: They are just too convenient. In fact, I think mocks are verbose and painful to maintain. I'd change that line for fear of losing readers who feel like I do, since it's not key for your pattern. I'd also consider putting a before and after example. Still, overall, quite good. I like the article.

I strongly dislike the line: They are just too convenient. In fact, I think mocks are verbose and painful to maintain. I’d change that line for fear of losing readers who feel like I do, since it’s not key for your pattern.

I’d also consider putting a before and after example.

Still, overall, quite good.

]]>